Decipon
See the tactics, not just the content.
Decipon scores influence tactics in articles, posts, and statements across twenty categories: emotional manipulation, missing information, tribal division, suspicious timing, uniform messaging, and the rest. Scores range from 0 (minimal tactics) to 100 (heavy use). It does not tell you what is true. It shows you how the content tries to influence you.
Every finding comes with the textual evidence that triggered it. Every score is paired with two perspectives: a critical read that weighs the manipulation signals, and a supportive read that weighs the underlying claims against available data. You see where they agree, where they diverge, and what to investigate further. The score is the start of the question, not the answer.
Built on the Influence Tactics Protocol
Decipon runs on the Influence Tactics Protocol (ITP), an open standard Synapti maintains. The methodology is auditable. Anyone can replicate the scoring, contest a finding, or extend the framework. Closed verdict tools that ask you to trust them are not the move.
Who uses it
Readers verifying news before they share it. Journalists running source material through a structured analysis pass. Researchers analyzing manipulation patterns at scale via API. Publishers integrating credibility scoring into editorial workflows. Different audiences, same principle: see the tactics, decide for yourself.
Where it lives
- Web app at decipon.com for analyzing pasted text or live news.
- Browser extension for inline scoring on the pages you read.
- API for batch analysis, dataset work, and editorial integration.
- Publisher badges that surface credibility scoring on the source itself.